At the present time, all these sciences or even a third of them after one thousand three hundred years - having grown through the meeting of minds and the expansion of their results - could not be found in a single person even in civilized places and among clever people. So whoever decks out his conscience with fairness will confirm that the Shari'a is always beyond human power, and was particularly so at that time. And he will endorse the statement "you haven't been able to do it and you won't be able to."
Virtue is that which is acknowledged even by enemies. For the American philosopher Cariyle1 quoted the famous German literary figure, Goethe, who asked after close study of the truths of the Qur'an: "Could the civilized world be further advanced within the bounds of Islam?" And he told himself: "Yes, indeed! For in one respect scholars now benefit from it." Cariyle said too that Islam appeared like a flaming light and devoured the religions of the time. And it had the right to do so,s for it contained nothing of the "vain janglings" of some of the Christian sects or the "rumours ... and idle wiredrawings" of the Jews. He confirmed the meaning of the verse: "Then produce a Sura like thereunto... But if you cannot... then fear the Fire..."(2:23-24)
If you were to ask: The Qur'an, and likewise its expounder - I mean Hadiths - have only taken summaries from all the sciences, but isn't it possible for a single individual to comprehend numerous summaries?
You would be told: Through their apt positioning and fitting use in fertile ground, in matters that are only hinted at - as we indicated in the second point above - such summaries reveal like glass a full cognizance of the science [in question] and complete proficiency in it. So the summary becomes like the science and it would not be possible for such a person [as you mention to comprehend it].
--------------------------------------------------------------------
1. historian and philosopher Thomas Cariyle (1795-1881) was actually Scottish. He was born in